Perkembangan Kompetensi Absolut PTUN Beserta Problematikanya
Analisis Menurut UU PTUN dan UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan
Downloads
Absolute competence is the authority of the State Administrative Court to adjudicate a case according to the object, material or subject matter of the dispute. The development of this Law is seen by differences in legal concepts and the existence of PTUN dispute objects regulated in the UUAP where procedural law has not been accommodated in the Law. -State Administrative Court Law (UUPTUN). The research method used is normative law in which legal norms, legal concepts, legal principles and legal ideology are the research objects. This study uses 2 (two) types of approaches, namely the statutory approach relating to the State Administrative Court and the historical approach regarding the existence of the State Administrative Court. In Indonesia, with the enactment of the UUAP, it has contained fundamental changes in the previous regulations, which are contained in the contents of the UUPTU. The problem of absolute competence of PTUN after the implementation of UUAP in handling PTUN disputes no longer recognizes individual elements in administrative decisions by judges. Whereas the provisions contained in Article 87 of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration have contained hidden changes in the provisions of Article 1 number 9 of Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning Administrative Justice Country.
Ismatullah, H. Deddy, Hukum Adminstrasi Negara, (Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2018)
Latif, Abdul, Hukum Administrasi Dalam Praktik Tindak Pidana Korupsi, (Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2014)
Diantha I Made Pasek, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum, (Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2017)
Indriyanto Seno Adji, Korupsi: Kriminalisasi Kebijakan Aparatur Negara (makalah), dalam Ridwan, Diskresi & Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah, (Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2014),
Hoesen, Zainal Arifin, Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia, (Imperium: Yogyakarta, 2013)
Ilmar, Aminuddin, Hukum Tata Pemerintahan, (Kharisma Putra Utama:Jakarta, 2014)
Marbun. S.F. Peradilan Administrasi Negara Dan Upaya Administrasif Di Indonesia, (Kreasi Total Media: Yogyakarta, 2021)
Philipus M. Hadjon, et.al., Hukum Administrasi dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, (Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 2011)
Utrecht, E, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara, (tanpa penerbit, cet keempat, tanpa tahun)
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo, Hukum Konsep Dan Metode, (Setara Press: Malang, 2013)
B. Undang-Undang
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014.
Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009.
C. Jurnal
Budiamin Rodding, Keputusan Fiktif Negatif dan Fiktif Positif Dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik, Tanjungpura Law Jurnal, Vol. 1, No. 1, Januari 2017, hal.30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v1i1.18328
Dewi Asimah. (2020). Implementasi Perluasan Kompetensi PTUN Dalam Mengadili Tindakan Faktual (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad/OOD. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan. Vol. 1. No. 1. h. 154-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v4i1.531
Dola Rizal, Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Menurut UU PTUN dan UU AP, Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, Vol. 3, No. 1, September 2018, hal.98
Fatria Khairo. Urgensi Pembatasan Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia, Jurnal Lex Librum, Vol. 3. No. 2, 2017. h. 545.
Onma Ezra Rodi Aprilo. Dkk, Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Sengketa Tanah Terhadap Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah, Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol. 5 No.2 Agustus 2022, h. 163
Philipus M. Hadjon, et.al., Hukum Administrasi dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, (Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2011), h.21-22
Yodi Martono Wahyunadi, Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Konteks Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol. 5, No. 1, Maret 2016, h.141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.5.1.2016.135-154
Copyright (c) 2023 Agus Nardi Nasution
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors confirm the transfer of all copyrights of the manuscripts to the Board Editors of Judex Laguens upon its acceptance for publication and that the Board Editors of Judex Laguens - Ikatan Hakim Indonesia have the right to publish, republish, transmit, and distribute them in the Judex Laguens journal or other media.
- Manuscripts published by Ikatan Hakim Indonesia are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Every submitted manuscript should be accompanied by a "Copyright Notice" and "Ethical Statement".
