Court Recognition of the Validity of Electronic Evidence in the Era of the Industrial Revolution 5.0 as an Effort Towards Advanced Indonesia
Pengakuan Pengadilan Terhadap Keabsahan Alat Bukti Elektronik di Era Revolusi Industri 5.0 sebagai Upaya Menuju Indonesia Maju
Downloads
Judges have dual duties that are challenging, complex and multidimensional consisting of both judicial and non-judicial duties. Changes in information technology towards a global economic industry have an impact on the world of justice. Therefore, the Industrial Revolution 5.0 must also be able to be answered by judges in handling every case, especially electronic evidence, especially economic disputes. This research aims to describe the actualization of judicial policies regarding electronic evidence in the era of the industrial revolution 5.0. The benefits of this research can be used as a basis for adaptive thinking for judges in carrying out their daily duties. The research method used is a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and uses a prescriptive analysis method. The research results show that the actualization of judicial policy regarding electronic evidence to guarantee the interests of legal certainty in the era of the Industrial Revolution 5.0 is by forming regulations governing the recognition and treatment of electronic evidence in order to realize unity and consistency in the implementation of electronic evidence law.
Ahyani, S. (2017). Land Registration As a Legal Constuctioon of Law in Order to Facing Asean Economic Communities. International Journal of Nusantara Islam, 6 (2), 198-207. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v6i2.6227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v6i2.6227
Alabdulatif, A.; Novad Neranjan Thilakarathne & Zaharaddeen Karami Lawal (2024). A Review on Security and Privacy Issues Pertaining to Cyber-Physical Systems in the Industry 5.0 Era. Computers, Materials and Continua, 80 (3), 3917-3943. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2024.054150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2024.054150
Aminuddin, C. (2024). Peranan Bukti Ilmiah (Scientific Evidence) dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Hukum Perkara Tata Usaha Negara Lingkungan Hidup. Iblam Law Review, 4 (1), 266-275. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i1.264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i1.264
Asa, A. I.; Misnal Munir & Rr. Siti Murni Ningsih. (2021). Nonet and Selznick's Responsive Law Concept in a Historical Philosophy Perspective. Crepido, 3 (2), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.3.2.96-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.3.2.96-109
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia).
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang. Cet. Pertama, (Jakarta: Konstitusi Pers).
Asimah, D. (2020). Menjawab Kendala Pembuktian dalam Penerapan Alat Bukti Elektronik. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 3 (2), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.322020.97-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.322020.97-110
Custers, B. (2024). A Fair Trial in Complex Technology Cases: Why Courts and Judges Need a Basic Understanding of Complex Technologies. Computer Law & Security Review, 52 (April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105935
Guo, Z. (2023). Regulating the Use of Electronic Evidence in Chinese Courts: Legislative Efforts, Academic Debates and Practical Applications. Computer Law & Security Review, 48 (April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105774
Heriani, F. N. (05-10-2022). "Kutipan Penting Prof. Erman Rajagukguk yang Selalu Diingat Kolega". https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/kutipan-penting-prof-erman-rajagukguk-yang-selalu-diingat-kolega-lt633d857f435a2/, diakses 12 Agustus 2024.
Javed, A. R.; Faisal Shahzad; Saifur Rehman; Yousaf Bin Zikria; Imam Razzak; Zunera Jalil & Guandong Xu. (2022). Future Smart Cities: Requirements, Emerging Technologies, Applications, Challenges, and Future Aspects. Cities, 129 (October). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103794
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2009). Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Administrasi Pengadilan dalam Empat Lingkungan Peradilan. Buku II (Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia).
Msefula, G.; Tony Chieh-Tse Hou & Tina Lemesi. (2024). Dynamics of Legal Structure and Geopolitical Influence on Carbon Tax in Response to Green Transportation. Applied Energy, 371 (Oktober). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123682
Pahlevi, F. (2022). Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia Perspektif Legal System Lawrence M. Freidmen. El Dusturie: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan, 1 (1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.21154/eldusturie.v1i1.4097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21154/eldusturie.v1i1.4097
Papagianneas, S. & Nino Junius. (2023). Fairness and Justice Through Automation in China's Smart Courts. Computer Law & Security Review, 51 (November). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105897
Rohmatin, I. T. & M. Nur Syafiuddin. (2020). The Reformulation of Parties Domicile Requirements in Small Claim Court. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9 (3), 527-546. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.3.2020.523-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.3.2020.523-542
Rusmini; Alifatul Laili Masfiah; Taufiqur Rohman; Putri Amelia Amanda & Shofiana Firdaus Zahro. (2022). Peluang Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif di Era Society 5.0 bagi Generasi Milenial. Risalah Iqtisadiyah: Journal of Sharia Economics, 1 (1), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.59107/ri.v1i1.21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59107/ri.v1i1.21
Sahir, S. H.; Abdurrozzaq Hasibuan; Lefrand Sermon Pasuhuk; Andrew Christian Aseng; Go George Herbert; Annisa Ilmi Faried; Muhammad Ichsan Gaffar; Elvis Ronald Sumanti & Windi Pratiwi. (2024). Ekonomi Global: Tantangan dan Peluang di Era Digital. (Jakarta: Yayasan Kita Menulis).
Saputra, I. (2022). Dampak Masyarakat 5.0 terhadap Ketahanan Nasional. at-Tawasul; Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, 1 (2), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.51192/ja.v1i2.211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51192/ja.v1i2.211
Schmidt, R.; Michael Mohring; Ralf-Christian Harting & Christopher Reichstein. (2015). Industry 4.0-Potentials for Creating Smart Products: Empirical Research Results. Business Information System, XV (352), 38-82. https/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19027-3_2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19027-3_2
Sugiarto, E. C. (13-11-2018). "Ekonomi Kreatif Masa Depan Indonesia". https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/ekonomi_kreatif_ masa_depan_indonesia, diakses 21 Agustus 2024.
Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 tentang Pemberlakuan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2016 sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas bagi Pengadilan.
Suwatno. (10-12-2021). "Transformasi Digital Menuju Era Digital Society Sebagai Akselerasi Kebangkitan Ekonomi Nasional". https://berita.upi.edu/transformasi-digital-menuju-era-digital-society-sebagai-akselerasi-kebangkitan-ekonomi-nasional/, diakses 20 November 2024.
Suyatno. (2023). Kelemahan Teori Sistem Hukum Menurut Lawrence M. Friedman dalam Hukum Indonesia. Ius Facti: Jurnal Berkala Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bung Karno, 2 (1), 197-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.61802/if.v2i1%20Juni.447.
Syafiuddin, M. N. (2021). Reformulasi Pengaturan Pemenuhan Hak Nafkah Lampau Anak Berbasis pada Perlindungan Anak dan Kemaslahatan Keluarga. Disertasi (Malang: Universitas Brawijaya).
Taverne, B. M. (08-07-2015). “Bismar Siregar Hakim Kontroversial yang Berhati Nurani,” https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt559d06730db6c/ bismar-siregar--hakim-kontroversial-yang-berhati-nurani/, diakses 21 Desember 2024.
UK Government. (25-02-2020). Financial Sector and Intellectual Property Programme-UK-Indonesia Prosperity Fund. E-Commerce IP Enforcement Workshop, 25 Februari 2020.
Wibisono, Y. (2022). Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Perkara di Pengadilan Agama. Al-Mabsut Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial, 16 (2), 219-231. https://doi.org/10.56997/almabsut.v16i2.687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56997/almabsut.v16i2.687
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.
Copyright (c) 2025 Judex Laguens - Ikatan Hakim Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors confirm the transfer of all copyrights of the manuscripts to the Board Editors of Judex Laguens upon its acceptance for publication and that the Board Editors of Judex Laguens - Ikatan Hakim Indonesia have the right to publish, republish, transmit, and distribute them in the Judex Laguens journal or other media.
- Manuscripts published by Ikatan Hakim Indonesia are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Every submitted manuscript should be accompanied by a "Copyright Notice" and "Ethical Statement".
