Mendesain Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Tentang Opened Legal Policy
Suatu Upaya Mewujudkan Integritas Peradilan
Keywords:
State Administrative Court, Opened Legal Policy, Judicial Integrity, Fakultas Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri, IAINAbstract
The Administrative Court Judge's decision according to paragraph 97 section (7) Law Number 5 of 1986 consists of 4 types of decisions, namely: (a) Rejected Decision, (b) Accepted Decision, (c) Not Accepted Decision, (d) Aborted Decision. A State Administrative Decree (KTUN) can be defended, if the KTUN does not actually conflict with the Legislation and AUPB. This raises a new question, can a KTUN be defended on the grounds that the KTUN is an Opened Legal Policy from a State Administrative Agency or Official? In this paper the author tries to formulate an ideal design regarding PTUN decisions under the pretext of opened legal policy. The aim is that in the future there will be no debates regarding all decisions issued by the PTUN which are none other than as a momentum to realize an integrity of the judiciary in the life of the nation and state. The author in his writings uses the normative juridical method with statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, and case approaches.
References
Ahmad Gelora Mahardika. “Konvensi Ketatanegaraan dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional di Indonesia Pasca Era Reformasi.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 8, no. 1 (15 Mei 2019): 55–67.
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi. “KBBI.” Diakses 15 November 2022. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/konstitusi.
Bakri, Muhammad. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia Jilid I: Sistem Hukum Indonesia Pada Era Reformasi. Pertama. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press, 2011.
Brught, Gr der, dan J D C Winkelman. “Penyelesaian Kasus.” Terjemahan B. Arief Sidharta. Jurnal Pro Justitia 12, no. 1 (2011): 35–36.
Edward H. Levi. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. 13 ed. University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Eri Yulikhsan. Keputusan Diskresi dalam Dinamika Pemerintahan (Aplikasi dalam PTUN). 1 ed. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Deepublish, 2016.
Fauzani, Muhammad Addi, dan Fandi Nur Rohman. “Urgensi Rekonstruksi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memberikan Pertimbangan Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka (Open Legal Policy).” Justitia et Pax 35, no. 2 (2020): 127–52. https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501.
Fika Nurul Ulya. “MK Tolak Seluruhnya Uji Materi ‘Presidential Threshold’ yang Diajukan PKS.” Diakses 16 November 2022. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/09/29/17084081/mk-tolak-seluruhnya-uji-materi-presidential-threshold-yang-diajukan-pks.
Hoekstra, Alain, dan Muel Kaptein. “The Integrity of Integrity Programs: Toward a Normative Framework.” Public Integrity 23, no. 2 (2021): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2020.1776077.
Huberts, L. W.J.C. “Integrity: What it is and Why it is Important.” Public Integrity, 2018, 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2018.1477404.
Konstitusi, Mahkamah. “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 38/PUUXI/ 2013,” 2013.
———. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 50/PUU-X/2012 (2012).
———. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 53/PUUXV/ 2017 (2017).
———. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor No.005 /PUU-III/2005 (2005).
———. Putusan Mahkamah Nomor 86/ PUU-X/2012 (2012).
Lailam, Tanto. “Pro-Kontra Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Undang-Undang yang Mengatur Eksistensinya.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 4 (20 Mei 2016): 795–824. https://doi.org/10.31078/JK1247.
M Yahya Harahap, S H. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Sinar Grafika, 2023.
Mahatta, Afdhal, dan Satya Arinanto. “Independence of Judicial Power in The Problems of The Period of Constitutional Judge in Indonesia.” Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 15, no. 1 (23 Oktober 2022): 434–52. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2022-00029.
Manan, Bagir. Konvensi ketatanegaraan. Cetakan 1. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2006.
———. “Tantangan terhadap Perkembangan Administrasi Negara.” Majalah Varia Peradilan. Tahun XXIV, no. 284 (2009).
Maridjo, Maridjo. “FUNGSI PERDILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM RANGKA MEWUJUDKAN PEMERINTAHAN YANG BERSIH.” MAGISTRA Law Review 2, no. 01 (22 Maret 2021): 40–62. http://sister.untagsmg.ac.id/index.php/malrev/article/view/2065.
Pieter Hack. “Introduction Judicial Integrity.” In Judicial Integrity, diedit oleh Andras Sajo, 2–3. Koninklijke Brill NV Incorporates The Imprint Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.
Radita Ajie. “Batasan Pilihan Kebijakan Pembentuk Undang-Undang (Open Legal Policy) dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 13, no. 01 (Juni 2016): 111–20.
Rumokoy, Donald A. Praktik konvensi ketatanegaraan di Indonesia: kajian perbandingan di Inggris, Amerika Serikat, dan Belanda. Jakarta: Media Prima Aksara, 2011.
Stelmach, J., dan Bartosz Borek. “Controversy over Legal Method in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” In Methods of legal reasoning, 1–15. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4939-0_1.
Wibowo, Mardian. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Paper disampaikan pada forum “Sosialisasi Peningkatan Pemahaman Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara bagi Pengurus dan Anggota Organisasi Mahasiswa Lintas Agama”, di Pusat Pendidikan Pancasila dan Konstitusi MKRI, Cisarua, 18 April 2018. Jakarta, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Fikri Alan, Fenolia Intan Saputri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read our Posting Your Article Policy here.
- The work is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- The work has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Judex Laguens agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
