REVITALISASI KEMANDIRIAN HAKIM MELALUI KONSEP PERADILAN RAMAH SEBAGAI WUJUD OPTIMALISASI AKUNTABILITAS LEMBAGA PERADILAN INDONESIA

Authors

  • Ingrit Ingrit UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2024/jl.v1i2.20

Keywords:

Independensi; Hakim; Kekuasaan Kehakiman; Lembaga Peradilan; Publik

Abstract

One of the big challenges from the past until now for judicial independence in Indonesia, namely the large number of interventions that come from various parties, both internal and external. This phenomenon illustrates that the current judicial situation is unhealthy, because institutions that should stand by maintaining their independence, are actually weakening due to influences and conflicts that attack the integrity of the judicial institution. This situation certainly raises questions from the public about the demise of Indonesia's judicial independence, which ultimately makes the public lose confidence in the judiciary as a place to seek justice. The judge in this case as a functional body of the implementation of the judiciary, which basically the judicial power is formed and compiled on the basis of legislation. As a law enforcer, the integrity of judges can be seen through their decisions, therefore judges must have freedom and moral values as their authority to decide cases, because the independence of judges is a representation of the state of law. Although various policy measures have been pursued in order to reform the judiciary, without independence or independence in the judicial power body, it will certainly be easier to provide access to opportunities that can affect and adversely affect including paving the way for the emergence of abuse of power or deviation of power and also the neglect of human rights by state rulers.

References

Adonara, Firman Floranta. “Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Memutuskan Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (2015): 219.

Barry, Brian. Justice as Imparsial. Oxford: Claredon, Press, 1995.

Basah, Sjachran. Eksistensi Dan Tolak Ukur Badan Peradilan Administrasi Di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni, 1997.

Dahlan, Abdul Aziz, and Haji. Ensiklopedia Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, 2001.

Djohansjah, J. Reformasi Mahkamah Agung Menuju Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Bekasi: Kasaint Blanc, 2008.

Enggarani, Nuria Siswi. “Independensi Peradilan Dan Negara Hukum.” Law and Justice 3, no. 2 (n.d.): 84–86.

———. “Independensi Peradilan Dan Negara Hukum.” Law and Justice 3, no. 2 (2018): 83.

Garner, Brayen A. Black’s Law Dictionary. St. Paul: West Publishing co, 2009.

———. Black’s Law Dictionary. St. Paul: West Publishing co, 2009.

H, Sarwata. Kebijakan Dan Strategi Penegakan Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: LEHMANAS, 1999.

Hertoni, Marcsellino. “Independensi Kekuasaan Hakim Dalam Mencari Kebenaran Materiil.” Lex Crime 5, no. 1 (2016): 46.

Ishaq. Metode Penelitian Hukum Dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Serta Disertasi. Bandung: ALFABETA CV, 2017.

Kamil, H Ahmad. Filsafat Kebebasan Hakim. Jakarta: Kencana Media Group, 2012.

Lev, Daniel S. Hukum Dan Politik Di Indonesia. Jakarta: LPPES, 1990.

Lihat Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 (n.d.).

Lihat Undang-Undang Negara Republik Tahun 1945 (n.d.).

M, Hajar. Model-Model Pendekatan Dalam Penelitian Hukum Dan Fiqh. Pekanbaru: UIN SUSKA RIAU, 2015.

Manan, Bagir. Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia. Bandung: LPPM UNISBA, 1995.

Marzuki, Peter Muhammad. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2006.

———. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

Mertokusumo, Sudikmo. “Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Fakultas Hukum UII 9, no. 4 (1997): 4.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Relevansi Peneguhan Etika Profesi Bagi Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum UGM, 1995.

Moh. Mahfud MD. Hukum Dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Gama Media, 1999.

———. “Politik Hukum Untuk Jurisprudensi Lembaga Peradilan.” Jurnal Hukum Fakultas Hukum UII 9, no. 6 (1997): 26.

Montesquieu. The Spirit of The Law. New York: Hafner Press, 1949.

Poerwadarminta, W.J.S. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2006.

Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.

Sudirman, Antonius. Hati Nurani Hakim Dan Putusannya. Suatu Pendekatan Dari Pespektif Ilmu Hukum Perilaku (Behavioral Jurispridence) Kasus Hakim Bismar Siregar. Jakarta: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.

Susanto, Nur Agus. “Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dan Efektifitas Sanksi Untuk Kasus Hakim Penerima Suap.” Jurnal Yudisial 4, no. 1 (2011): 37.

Suyuthi, Wildan. Kode Etik Hakim. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2013.

Usman, Anwar. Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Depok: PT RAJAGRAFINDO PERSADA, 2020.

———. Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Depok: PT RAJAGRAFINDO PERSADA, 2020.

———. Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Depok: PT RAJAGRAFINDO PERSADA, 2020.

Yusuf, Theo, and Hermansyah. Akuntabilitas Mahkamah Agung. Jakarta: PT RAJAGRAFINDO PERSADA, 2016.

———. Akuntabilitas Mahkamah Agung. Depok: PT RAJAGRAFINDO PERSADA, 2016.

Published

09/07/2023

How to Cite

Ingrit, Ingrit. 2023. “REVITALISASI KEMANDIRIAN HAKIM MELALUI KONSEP PERADILAN RAMAH SEBAGAI WUJUD OPTIMALISASI AKUNTABILITAS LEMBAGA PERADILAN INDONESIA”. Judex Laguens 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.2024/jl.v1i2.20.

Issue

Section

Articles