STRENGTHENING THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CHAMBER SYSTEM IN GENERAL JUDICIARY

Authors

  • Ilhamdi Putra Constitutional Law Departemen, Faculty of Law Andalas University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2024/jl.v1i2.21

Keywords:

Integrity, Chamber System, General Judiciary

Abstract

The dynamics of community development have resulted in an increase in legal conflicts arising as factual expressions between legal subjects, as well as influencing an increase in cases in court. Meanwhile, the General Court does not classify the Panel of Judges based on areas of expertise, between criminal and civil cases, which has the potential to disrupt the integrity of the judiciary. This phenomenon boils down to two issues, namely the urgency of classifying the fields of expertise of judges in the General Courts in terms of the public character of criminal cases and the private character of civil cases, as well as the workload of judges and the design of the chamber system within the General Courts. This study concludes that the absence of a judge's expertise in the General Courts greatly affects the integrity of the judiciary. This happened due to the mixing of judges with a variety of cases of a different nature, between public and private. This phenomenon necessitates the application of a chamber system in the General Courts through the Criminal Chamber and the Civil Chamber in the District Court and High Court. This design which focuses on the judges' areas of expertise is in line with the model for filling the positions of Candidates for Supreme Court Justices which go directly to the Chamber System through areas of expertise.

Keyword: Integrity, Chamber System, General Judiciary

References

Buku

Arto, A. Mukti, Pembaruan Hukum Islam melalui Putusan Hakim, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2015.

Chmieliński, Maciej, dan Michał Rupniewski (Editors), The Philosophy of Legal Change: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Processes, Routledge, London-New York, 2020.

Hamzah, Amir, Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Tingkat Banding, Setara Press, Malang, 2013.

Killinger, Barbara, Integrity: Doing the Right Thing for the Right Reason, McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal, Quebec, 2010.

Manullang, E. Fernando M., Legisme, Legalitas, dan Kepastian Hukum, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2016.

Martono, Nanang, Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial: Perspektif Klasik, Modern, Posmodern, dan Poskolonial, RajaGrafindo Persada, Depok, 2014.

Pitan Daslani (Editor), Menyibak Kebenaran: Eksaminasi Terhadap Putusan Perkara Irman Gusman, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta, 2018.

Thompson, Kevin, dan Lester Embree (Editor), Phenomenology of the Political: Contributions to Phenomenology (Volume 38), Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2013.

Jurnal

Ilhamdi Putra dan Khairul Fahmi, “Karakteristik Ne Bis In Idem dan Unsurnya dalam Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi” (2021) 18;2, Jurnal Konstitusi.

Laporan Tahunan

Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Tahun 2018: Era Baru Peradilan Modern Berbasis Teknologi Informasi

Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019: Keberlanjutan Modernisasi Peradilan

Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Tahun 2020: Optimalisasi Peradilan Modern Berkelanjutan

Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Tahun 2021: Akselerasi Perwujudan Peradilan Modern

Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022: Integritas Tangguh, Kepercayaan Publik Tumbuh

Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana

UU Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975 Tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan

Putusan Pengadilan

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 101K/Sip/1955

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1456 K/Sip/1967

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 123 K/Sip/1968

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 497 K/Sip/1973

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 547 K/Sip/1973

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 588 K/Sip/1973

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 647 K/Sip/1973

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1149 K/Sip/1982

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3136 K/Pdt/1983

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1226 K/Sip/2001

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor 385/PDT.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel

Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 13/Pdt.Sus Pailit/2014/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst

Tesis

Ilhamdi Putra, Karekteristik dan Dampak Pembatasan Pengujian Norma Undang-Undang melalui Permohonan yang Tidak Dapat Diajukan Kembali di Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Gagasan The Living Constitution, Tesis Program Pascasarjana Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas, Padang, 2021.

Majalah

Majalah Konstitusi Nomor 110, April 2016.

Internet

Administrator, Dominus Litis, dalam The Law Dictionary, https://thelawdictionary.org/dominus-litis/. Dikunjungi 5 Maret 2023.

Administrator, Nemo Debet Bis Vexari, dalam Oxford Reference https://www.oxfordreference. com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.201108031002288 14. Dikunjungi 5 Maret 2023.

Administrator, Nihil in Lege Intolerabilius Est (quam) Eandem Rem Diverso Jure Censeri , dalam OpenJurist https://openjurist.org/law-dictionary-blacks/nihil-in-lege-intolerabilius-est-quam-eandem-rem-diverso-jure-censeri. Dikunjungi 5 Maret 2023.

Asep Nursobah, Sejarah Sistem Kamar pada Mahkamah Agung, dalam Mahkamah Agung https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/sistem-kamar/sejarah-sistem-kamar. Dikunjungi 6 Maret 2023.

Leslie Green dan Thomas Adam, Legal Positivism, dalam Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosphy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/Legal-Positivism/. Dikunjungi 6 Maret 2023.

Richard Pallardy, Conflict (Psychology), dalam Encyclopædia Britannica https://www.britannica.com/science/conflict-psychology. Dikunjungi 6 Maret 2023.

Published

09/07/2023

How to Cite

Putra, Ilhamdi. 2023. “STRENGTHENING THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIARY THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CHAMBER SYSTEM IN GENERAL JUDICIARY”. Judex Laguens 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.2024/jl.v1i2.21.

Issue

Section

Articles