THE EXISTENCE AND ROLE OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

ROLE OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE

Authors

  • teddy lahati Pengadilan Agama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25216/jl.v2i1.34

Keywords:

Electronic evidence, autentifikasi, Elitigasi

Abstract

Electronic evidence in the judicial legal system in Indonesia is something new so it has become an object of study in exploring its existence and role. The legality of electronic evidence has become a polemic about how the examination of electronic evidence is regulated in statutory regulations, what is the validity of electronic evidence, what is the procedure for authenticating electronic evidence in trial examinations, and what is the practice of examining electronic evidence in trials so that appropriate solutions must be found? to answer the legal phenomenon in question. This research is descriptive-analytic normative research, namely by examining existing regulations. Data collection is carried out by collecting regulations in the ITE Law, KUHAP, Perma, and the like. The results of the research conclude that First, electronic documents have received recognition as valid evidence in civil trials, in accordance with the Company Documents Law and ITE Law Number 11 of 2008, but as part of the procedural law, electronic documents do not yet have regulations on the procedures for submitting them in trial, procedures for showing it to the opposing party. Second, the technical submission and technical aspects of showing electronic documents at trial can be answered through clear regulations or technical instructions for Elitigation in practice at trial, but to provide legal certainty it needs to be regulated in the Civil Procedure Law or compiled in Supreme Court Regulations

References

Agung Iswanto, "Keabsahan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia", (20 Juli 2020), https://www.dilmiltama.go.id/home/e-journal/KEABSAHANALATBUKTIELEKTRONIKREV.pdf, diakses pada tanggal 20 Juli 2023.

Happy Try Sulistyono, "Prosedur Autentifikasi Alat Bukti Elektronik Pada Pemeriksaan Persidangan", (20 Juli 2020), https://pn-sumedang.go.id/file_lama/PROSEDUR%20AUTENTIFIKASI%20ALAT%20BUKTI%20ELEKTRONIK%20PADA%20PEMERIKSAAN%20PERSIDANGAN.pdf, diakses pada tanggal 20 Juli 2023.

Linda L. Listrom, et.al, "The Next Frontier: Admissibility of Electronic Evidence", (20 Jun 2016), https://fliphtml5.com/id/liks/dewg/basic, diakses pada tanggal 20 Juli 2023, pukul 12.00 WIB.

Muhammad Nur Al-Azhar, Digital Forensik Panduan Praktis Investigasi Komputer, (Jakarta: Salemba Infotek, 2012).

Muhammad Ubayyu Rikza, "Alat Bukti Elektronik dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pembuktian Perdata di Pengadilan", (24 Mar 2021), https://pa-raha.go.id/artikel-pengadilan/377-alat-bukti-elektronik-dan-implikasinya-terhadap-pembuktian-perdata-di-pengadilan, diakses pada tanggal 20 Juli 2023 pukul 12.21 WIB.

Munir Fuady, Teori Hukum Pembuktian Pidana dan Perdata, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti, 2012).

M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali, Edisi Kedua, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012).

Natsir Asnawi, Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Perdata di Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2013).

Saufa Ata Taqiyya, "Syarat dan Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti Elektronik", (18 Ags 2021), http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/cl5461/syarat-dan-kekuatan-hukum-alat-buktielektronik, diakses tanggal 22 Januari 2020, pukul 09.03 WITA.

Siswanto Sunarso, Hukum Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik: Studi Kasus "Prita Mulyasari", (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2009).

Published

03/22/2024

How to Cite

lahati, teddy. 2024. “THE EXISTENCE AND ROLE OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA: ROLE OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE”. Judex Laguens 2 (1):97-107. https://doi.org/10.25216/jl.v2i1.34.

Issue

Section

Articles