Diskursus Pemenuhan Kesejahteraan Hakim Sebagai Pencegahan Judicial Corruption Melalui Rancangan Undang-Undang Jabatan Hakim: Studi Komparatif Dengan Negara Amerika dan Kanada
Downloads
Judges' welfare provision has stagnated, affecting their integrity. The increasingly complex problem actually stems from regulations that currently cannot accommodate all financial rights and facilities of judges. For example, in the dynamics related to the amount of basic salary and allowances in Government Regulation No. 94/2012 until its first amendment, it is still said to be very minimal, as well as Decision No. 23 P/HUM/2018 which revoked the basic salary of judges with Civil Servants (PNS) but there was no follow-up after the decision to form a legal umbrella. Financial intervention will certainly have a great potential to occur among judges, when effectiveness is present due to the lack of the state in ensuring the welfare of judges, so that later decisions are given based on how much finance is offered by individuals through transactional activities that lead to judicial corruption. The research method uses normative jurisprudence referring to laws and regulations as well as literature studies in the form of books, journals, and other literature. The research is prescriptive in nature to find ideal ideas accompanied by comparative studies to examine legal systems in other countries. The results show that the problematic system of judges‘ salaries, as well as the limited regulations, need to emulate the United States, which applies constitutional salary protection and prohibits congress from reducing judges’ salaries. In Canada there is a judicial commission function to conduct investigations related to the adequacy of salaries and other amounts that must be disclosed to government-appointed judges periodically. The construction of the regulation of financial rights and facilities of judges needs to pay attention to the principles of judicial remuneration and research related to its effect on improving performance, to be accommodated later in the Judgeship Bill as a legal umbrella to improve the welfare of judges in Indonesia.
Handoko, Duwi. Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia. Pekanbaru: Hawa dan Ahwa, 2015.
Hantoro, Novianto Murti, Monika Suhayati, Denico Doly, Prianter Jaya Hairi, and Harris Yonatan Parmahan Sibuea. Hakim: Antara Pengaturan Dan Implementasinya. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2018.
Holton, Woody. Unruly Americans and the Origins of the Constitution. California: Hill and Wang, 2008.
Suparto. Negara Hukum, Demokrasi Dan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bina Karya (BIKA), 2019.
Syamsuddin, Amir. Integritas Penegak Hukum: Hakim, Jaksa, Polisi, Dan Pengacara. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2008.
Syamsudin, Muhammad, and M H SH. Konstruksi Baru Budaya Hukum Hakim Berbasis Hukum Progressif. Bandung: Kencana, 2011.
Tushnet, Mark. The Constitution of the United States of America: A Contextual Analysis. Bloomsburg: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509901777
Antasia, Pramudita, and Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba. “Hakim Sebagai Penegak Etika Profesi Hukum: Suatu Kajian Tentang Independensi Dan Integritas.” Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 1, no. 11 (2023).
Bahmid, Fahmi H, and Erwin Syarhruddin. “Makna Pengisian Jabatan Hakim Agung Yang Dapat Menuju Kualifikasi Peradilan Pada Mahkamah Agung Republik Iandonesia Yang Kompeten Dan Berintegritas.” Palar (Pakuan Law Review) Vol 7 (2021): 487–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v7i2.4308
Choi, Stephen J, G Mitu Gulati, and Eric A Posner. “Are Judges Overpaid?: A Skeptical Response to the Judicial Salary Debate.” Journal of Legal Analysis 1, no. 1 (2009): 47–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/jla.v1i1.3
Eskridge Jr, William N. “America’s Statutory Constitution.” UC Davis L. Rev. 41 (2007): 1.
Haro, Jose Manuel De, Juan Luis Castejon, and Raquel Gilar. “Personality and Salary at Early Career: The Mediating Effect of Emotional Intelligence.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 31, no. 14 (2020): 1844–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1423365
Kahana, Tsvi. “The Constitution as a Collective Agreement: Remuneration of Provincial Court Judges in Canada.” Queen’s LJ 29 (2003): 445.
Marbun, S F. “Negara Hukum Dan Kekuasaan Kehakiman.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 6, no. 9 (1997): 9–19.
McNeil, James. “Constitutional Law-Right of Labor Union to Hire Attorney on Salary Basis to Handle Workmen’s Compensation Claims-United Mine Workers of America, District 12 v. Illinois State Bar Association.” Student LJ 1 (1967): 316.
Mohammad, Mohammad. “Kajian Hukum Atas Jaminan Keamanan Dan Kesejahteraan Hakim Menurut Pp Nomor 94 Tahun 2012 Tentang Hak Keuangan Dan Fasilitas Hakim Yang Berada Di Bawah Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Yustitia 20, no. 2 (2020).
Paruntu, David Daniel. “Tolok Ukur Penegakkan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi.” Lex Crimen 3, no. 2 (2014).
Ramadhana, Kurnia. “Menyoal Kinerja KPK: Antara Harapan Dan Pencapaian.” Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi 5, no. 2 (2019): 151–63.
Rayfindratama, Alva Dio. “Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Di Pengadilan.” Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Negara 1, no. 2 (2023): 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v1i2.409
Robinson Jr, Theodore C. “Constitutional Law-Taxing Salaries of Federal Judges.” Law Notes 1 (1939): 70.
Setiadi, Edi. “Hubungan Ideal Komisi Yudisial Dan Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 5, no. 2 (2021): 161–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v5i2.459
Susanto, Mei. “Hak Angket DPR, KPK Dan Pemberantasan Korupsi.” Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi 4, no. 2 (2018): 99–127.
Sutin, L Anthony. “Check, Please: Constitutional Dimensions of Halting the Pay of Public Officials.” J. Legis. 26 (2000): 221.
Trebilcock, Michael. “The Doctrine of Privity of Contract: Judicial Activism in the Supreme Court of Canada.” The University of Toronto Law Journal 57, no. 2 (2007): 269–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tlj.2007.0022
Wajdi, Farid. “Independensi Dan Akuntabilitas Peradilan.” MeluruskanArah Manajemen Kekuasaan Kehakiman 23, no. 3 (2018).
Zahra, Adinda Thalia, Aditia Sinaga, and Muhammad Rafli Firdausi. “Problematika Independensi Hakim Sebagai Pelaksana Kekuasaan Kehakiman.” Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 3, no. 2 (2023): 2009–25.
Ziegel, Jacob S. “The Supreme Court Radicalizes Judicial Compensation.” Const. F. 9 (1997): 31.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157, Anotasi 5076)
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 94 Tahun 2012 tentang Hak Keuangan Dan Fasilitas Hakim Yang Berada Di Bawah Mahkamah Agung.
Copyright (c) 2024 Daffa Ladro Kusworo, Maghfira Nur Khaliza Fauzi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors confirm the transfer of all copyrights of the manuscripts to the Board Editors of Judex Laguens upon its acceptance for publication and that the Board Editors of Judex Laguens - Ikatan Hakim Indonesia have the right to publish, republish, transmit, and distribute them in the Judex Laguens journal or other media.
- Manuscripts published by Ikatan Hakim Indonesia are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Every submitted manuscript should be accompanied by a "Copyright Notice" and "Ethical Statement".
