Iniating the Paradigm of Transitive Legal Consideation: An Endeavor to Maintain the Dignity of Judges Through Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.2.3.12.2024.382-398Keywords:
Paradigm, Law, Consideration, Transitive, JudgeAbstract
The public places great expectations on the shoulders of judges and our judicial system. Because one of the essential instruments in law enforcement for justice seekers can be obtained through judges' decisions, a judge's decision in an epistemological perspective is a struggle of a judge's thoughts, both with his heart and conscience, logic, and other judges in his environment. The judge's decision has the power to transfer ownership, revoke freedom, limit arbitrariness, and even more fundamentally eliminate a person's right to life. Such a fundamental authority should be exercised in the right way, considering that the responsibility is not only horizontal but also vertical. However, the fact is that recently, there has been a dichotomy; not a few judges' decisions have triggered the birth of criticism and cynicism, equivalent to public distrust, and formed an attitude of doubt towards judges. This is saddening because not a few judges have mortgaged their dignity and nobility, resulting in decisions that do not reflect universal safety. Observing some of the urgency of judges' decisions in our judicial system, a new legal paradigm is needed, which becomes a grand design in carrying out the duties and decision-making of judges, which researchers term transitive. The transitive legal paradigm will be a milestone of justice in maintaining and defending the dignity of judges as representatives of God. Transitive means saving, reconciling, prospering, and making happy. The judge's decision ultimately becomes a universal salvation that is represented as a representative of God by prioritizing legal considerations for the common good. Thus, the transitive legal paradigm in judges' decisions will provide benefits for all parties, including judges, and the development of the law in the future.
Keywords: Paradigm, Law, Consideration, Transitive, Judge
References
Affandi, W., Hakim dan Penegakkan Hukum, (Bandung: PT Alumni, 1981).
Agung, N. D., Masalah Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Suatu Perkara Pidana, (Jakarta: Aksara Persada, 1987).
Asshiddiqie, J., Peradilan Etik Dan Etika Konstitusional, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014).
Arto, Mukti, 2004, Mencari Keadilan, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta
Fadilil Sumadi Ahmad, 2013, Pengawasan Dan Pembinaan Pengadilan “Fungsi Manajemen Mahkamah Agung Terhadap Pengadilan Dibawahnya Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945” , Intrasm Publishing, Malang.
Kelsen Hans, 2012, Pengantar Teori Hukum, Nusa Media, Bandung
Komisi Yudisial, 2014, “Disparitas Putusan Hakim, Identifikasi Dan Implikasi”, Secretariat Jendral Komisi Yudisial, Jakarta.
Komisi Yudisal, 2014, Kualitas Hakim Dalam Putusan, Jakarta
Lubis, A. H. (2024). Kedudukan Hakim Dalam Konstitusi.
Suparmono Rudi, 2006, Peran Serta Hakim Dalam Pembelajaran Hukum, Varia Peradilan, Ikahi, Jakarta
Suparmono Rudi, Peran Serta Hakim Dalam Pembelajaran Hukum, Varia Peradilan, Ikahi, Jakarta, 2006
Hamzah Andi, KUHP dan KUHAP, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 1996
Yamamah, A. (2019). Islam Transitif: Filsafat Milenial. Kencana.
Andrew Shandy Utam a, "Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terhadap Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia", Jurnal Ensiklopedia Social Review, Vol1,No. 3, (2019), h. 306.
Farhani, A., Azizah, F. N., & Kholifah, N. (2024). Urgensitas Penguatan Etika Profesi Hakim. Judex Laguens, 2(1), 55-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.55-74
Lubis, A. H., Lubis, Pagar & F. Lubis. . (2023). Maslahat Aspects as A Basis for Judges Considerations in the Implementation of Forced Money (Dwangsom) in Religious Courts. Pena Justisia, Vol. 22, No. 22, Juni 2023 263. http://dx.doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.2967 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.2967
Lubis, A. H.,& Mhd Hasbi. . (2024). Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Menetapkan Suatu Putusan di Persidangan Perkara Pidana. Madani, Vol. 1, No. 12, Januari 2024 356 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10441033
Lubis, A. H., Lubis, J. ., & Rizal, S. . (2022). Optimalisasi Pengawasan Dan Pembinaan Hakim Menuju Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Berintegritas Dan Bermartabat. Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP), 5(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v5i1.2456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v5i1.2456
Lubis, A. H., Siagian, F. S., Hasbi, M., Rizal, S., & Sinulingga, T. A. (2024). The Role of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct in Maintaining the Honor and Dignity of Judges. Law and Justice, 9(1), 33-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v9i1.4760
Lubis, A. H., Sitompul, A., Pinem, S., Zulyadi, R., & Siagian, F. (2024). Seeking Justice: Criticizing the Decision of the Tapak Tuan District Court Number 37/Pid. Sus/2020/PN. Ttn Regarding Domestic Violence. Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan, 11(1), 86-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v11i1.8591
Nurlaila Harun, “Proses Peradilan Dan ArtiSebuah Keyakinan Hakim dalam Mem utus Suatu Perkara di Pengadilan Agam a Manado”,Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, Vol. 15, No. 2, (2017), h. 107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30984/as.v15i2.479
Rosita Indrayati , 2016, Revitalisasi Peran Hakim Sebagai Pelaku Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Jember, Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/KP.2016.v38.i02.p02
Sanyoto, S. (2008). Penegakan hukum di indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 8(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2008.8.3.74
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andi Hakim Lubis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read our Posting Your Article Policy here.
- The work is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- The work has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Judex Laguens agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
