Urgensi Pemenuhan Kesejahteraan Hakim Sebagai Upaya Menegakkan Integritas

Authors

  • Putri Shania Azizah Dinnar Affiliation: Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Chesaria Anggun Permataningtyas Affiliation: Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Ridlo Ifran Addiasar Affiliation: Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Shelma Fatika Candra Kusumaningsih Affiliation: Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.2.3.12.2024.335-356

Keywords:

Judicial Integrity, Judge's Welfare, Indonesian Judge

Abstract

The issue regarding the welfare of judges, which continues to be discussed after the enactment of Government Regulation Number 94 of 2012 concerning the Financial Rights and Facilities of Judges under the Supreme Court, shows that there are serious problems in fulfilling the welfare of judges. A salary payment system that still equates the status of judges with Civil Servants (PNS) is considered inconsistent with the Supreme Court Decision Number 23 P/HUM/2018 which states that this system no longer has binding legal force. This research aims to find a measure of the welfare fulfillment received by judges and analyze the relationship between welfare and judge integrity. The research method used in this research is a juridical-empirical method with primary data in the form of questionnaire results regarding the welfare of judges in Indonesia. The results of the research show data that judges feel they have not achieved ideal welfare and this affects the judge's integrity. Current laws and regulations that regulate the welfare of judges are still unable to meet judges' expectations. The judge's right to fulfill welfare that has not been obtained will affect the judge's integrity in deciding a case. Based on these findings, fulfilling welfare is important because it plays a role in upholding the integrity of judges.

References

Henry Halim, “Asas Ius Curia Novit sebagai Pedoman Bagi Hakim untuk Menghasilkan Putusan yang Berkepastian Hukum, Kemanfaatan dan Berkeadilan”, Jiagonis: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara dan Bisnis, Vol. 5, No. 2, (2020).

Rusli Muhammad, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007).

Wahyu Sudrajat, “Berhenti Remehkan Hakim”, Kompasiana.com (25 Juni 2015), https://www.kompasiana.com/wahyusudrajat/550ed6e 6813311b62cbc65db/berhenti-remehkan-hakim, diakses 6 Maret 2024.

Abdul Hakim, “Menakar Rasa Keadilan pada Putusan Hakim Perdata Terhadap Pihak Ketiga yang Bukan Pihak Berdasarkan Perspektif Negara Hukum Pancasila”, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol. 6, No. 3 (2017), h. 361-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.361-378

Christian Victor Samuel Marzuki, John Dirk Pasalbessy dan Jetty Martje Patty, "Aspek Melawan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Perbuatan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dalam Penyaluran Bantuan Sosial di Masa PSBB", TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 7 (2021).

James Michael, "Reducing Corruption in The Judiciary", United States Agency for International Development, (Office of Democracy and Governance USAID Program Brief, DPK Consulting, 2009), h. 3, https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnadq106.pdf, diakses 13 Maret 2024.

Usulan Munas IKAHI XX-Tahun 2022.

PTUN Yogyakarta, Sosialisasi Manfaat Asuransi Mandiri Inhealth untuk Hakim Karier Mahkamah Agung RI. (20 Januari 2024). https://ptun-yogyakarta.go.id/4372-2/, diakses 21 Maret 2024.

Marsudi Dedi Putra, Negara Kesejahteraan (Welfare State) dalam Perspektif Pancasila, LIKHITAPRAJNA: Jurnal, Vol. 23 No. 2 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37303/likhitaprajna.v23i2.199

D.Y. Witanto dan Sunoto, “Ketika Pengadil Menuntut Hak Konstitusional”, Majalah Mahkamah Agung Edisi 4 (Mei 2014), https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/assets/majalah/Majalah_MA_Edisi4/majalah/assets/basic-html/page44.html, diakses 18 Maret 2024.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 23 P/HUM/2018, https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/d41dbc55362b7085cc53dda4fd21e2bf.html, diakses 18 Maret 2024.

Siti Mardiah dan Jasman, “Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penyalahgunaan Aset”, Jurnal KRISNA: Kumpulan Riset Akuntansi, vol. 13, No. 1 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/kr.13.1.2021.14-24

Mangihut Siregar, Antikorupsi (Surabaya: UWKS Press, 2023).

Jaka Isgiyata, Indayani, dan Eko Budiyoni, “Studi Tentang Teori Gone dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Fraud dengan Idealisme Pimpinan Sebagai Variabel Moderasi: Studi Pada Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Pemerintahan”, Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis, Vol. 5, No. 1 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v5i1.8253

Sari Rusmita, “Persepsi Mahasiswa Akuntansi Terhadap Korupsi”, Jurnal Audit dan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Tanjungpura, vol.4, No. 2 (2015).

Published

02-12-2024

How to Cite

Putri Shania Azizah Dinnar, Chesaria Anggun Permataningtyas, Ridlo Ifran Addiasar, & Shelma Fatika Candra Kusumaningsih. (2024). Urgensi Pemenuhan Kesejahteraan Hakim Sebagai Upaya Menegakkan Integritas . Judex Laguens, 2(3), 335–356. https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.2.3.12.2024.335-356

Issue

Section

Articles